It was an election interference case; not mundane. https://robertreich.substack.com/p/dont-call-it-the-hush-mon...

Yes, based on the tortuous logic that he would’ve lost the election if voters knew that a famous playboy had had an affair with a porn star. Of all the gaffes and scandals he had during his campaign, that would’ve been the one to sink his election chances. Sure thing.

And still at the end of it, it boiled down to “you should’ve classified the hush money as a campaign expense instead of a legal expense.” Do you seriously not understand why no one really cares?

The campaign obviously had that concern and acted on it; it’s irrelevant if you think it’s “tortuous logic”. When did the affair occur? When did the payment occur, and what was the surrounding context? — https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stormy_Daniels–Donald_Trump_...

Then, read this again — https://robertreich.substack.com/p/dont-call-it-the-hush-mon... “This case alleges that in 2016 Trump arranged to pay off an adult entertainer in order to hide his affair with her from the public. The important thing to keep in mind is that the money was given to protect Trump’s campaign for the presidency — not to protect his marriage or protect him from personal embarrassment.”

Agreed....this case is the lamest of lame and would not have been brought against anyone other than Trump and only because he was running for election. It is quite obviously a politicization of the justice system to anyone who is not a partisan ideologue. Dems can try to deny this but it really doesn't matter. They are just shooting themselves in the foot and losing support as a result.

You’re saying that entities exceeding legal limits on political contributions and attempting to conceal it by committing financial crimes is not a big deal, is not election interference, and doesn’t weaken our democracy. Thankfully, the jury, selected by both sides, that unanimously agreed on the 34 federal felony counts, disagrees with you.

Lol...selected by "both sides" in one of the most left-wing jurisdictions in America.

Considering when the affair occurred, when the payment occurred and surrounding context [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stormy_Daniels–Donald_Trump_...], and the strength of the evidence [Wapo article — https://archive.is/kmFCs], do you actually think “financial crimes occurred in order to conceal campaign finance crimes” is a far-fetched verdict that was made up by a unanimous 12-member left-wing jury?

Yes. Absolutely.

Should have also mentioned (can’t edit my last reply) — many really care because they don’t agree that entities exceeding legal limits on political contributions and attempting to conceal it by committing financial crimes is not a big deal, is not election interference, and doesn’t weaken our democracy.

If we are talking about election interference what should we say about the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story just prior to the 2020 election. This include the politicization of the CIA/FBI to suppress the story by influencing social media companies, then getting 50 intel officers to all lie in unison that it had "has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation".

By any measure this is way worse than some stupid accounting classification with regard to hush money for a porn star? How come no charges were brought on this very serious charge?

People are nowhere near as stupid as the Democratic party likes to believe.

I’d like to learn more about all of the Hunter Biden laptop-related details that you’ve mentioned. Do you have a link to a reputable and credible source?

What happened was not an “accounting classification” issue. The jury, selected by both sides, unanimously agreed on the 34 federal felony counts because after hearing and seeing arguments, testimony, and evidence from both sides, they found it clear that this was not an “accounting classification” issue, but rather an issue of an entity exceeding legal limits on political contributions and attempting to conceal it by committing financial crimes.

Honestly the amount of info on the Hunter Biden laptop story is abundant so it puzzles me you'd even have to ask.

Zuckerberg talking about warning prompted Biden laptop story censorship https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-62688532

Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-...

NY Times https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/16/us/politics/republicans-h...

NY Times and Washington Post finally admit laptop is real https://nypost.com/2022/04/01/new-york-times-finally-admit-h...

And the 34 felony was about 34 payments for the one thing so in reality was just the one "crime" beefed up by a weaponized justice system to look worse than it was.

Again, it is obviously and emphatically true that this kind of govt election interference is way worse than whatever Trump did. So again why was there no charge over this?

And I'm just going to repeat, people are not nearly as stupid as the Democrat party thinks they are.

>>It’s the most mundane thing

If it's so mundane, why is it a felony then.

Because of the Democrat weaponization of the justice system, of course.

nice circular logic you got going on there.

I guess reality can sometimes be circular then....

Wasn't it already a felony long before all this?