Re:Now lie in it: an uxntal retrospective
by stavros on Wednesday November 06, 2024 @07:51AM
(#42061490)
This has strong Urbit vibes, somehow.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Now lie in it: an uxntal retrospective
by cpach on Wednesday November 06, 2024 @08:33AM
(#42062020)
Dunno. IMHO, it feels a lot more practical than Urbit.
Re:Now lie in it: an uxntal retrospective
by recursive on Wednesday November 06, 2024 @08:50AM
(#42062261)
I can basically understand what it is. So to me, it's very different.
Re:Now lie in it: an uxntal retrospective
by surprisetalk on Wednesday November 06, 2024 @08:52AM
(#42062286)
Urbit is an underrated project! It was definitely an inspiration for the language I’m working on:
Re:Now lie in it: an uxntal retrospective
by TOGoS on Wednesday November 06, 2024 @12:08PM
(#42065446)
I probably want to talk to you about programming language ideas.
What are your thoughts on Unison[0], which also uses hash-addressed code and managed effects?
Re:Now lie in it: an uxntal retrospective
by surprisetalk on Wednesday November 06, 2024 @01:20PM
(#42066746)
Sure, feel free to email me anytime :)
Unison seems cool! I met some Unison folks a few years back and our visions didn't have much overlap. Nice people, but their fundamental design decisions with hashes/effects/etc are incompatible with the web I'm trying to build.
Re:Now lie in it: an uxntal retrospective
by compressedgas on Wednesday November 06, 2024 @09:57AM
(#42063268)
I thought it was more https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHIP-8
The Urbit nock machine is very different.
Re:Now lie in it: an uxntal retrospective
by kragen on Wednesday November 06, 2024 @10:34AM
(#42063869)
Last time someone said that on here, one of the responses was, "Uxn is to Urbit as science is to scientology."
It may not be quite true (Urbit isn't completely fake) but it's sure funny.
Re:Now lie in it: an uxntal retrospective
by stavros on Wednesday November 06, 2024 @10:52AM
(#42064159)
Interesting, I've never heard of Uxn before, I'll take a closer look, thank you.