Be fair - I actually count at least 8. That's impressive af for 10 words.

Red herring, whataboutism, false dilemma, straw man, tu quoque, hasty generalization, moral equivalence, and appeal to extremism.

And with a dehumanization cherry on top.

Perhaps listing fallacies without adressing the core concern isn't the WINNING strategy you hoped it would be.

My core concern is that you feel comfortable talking about "removing" countries.

My secondary concern is your refusal to acknowledge/engage with the data which was presented to you, both in text and in interactive graphs.

And that's more than enough concern for me to refuse further engagement.