News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:KDE Linux by burky on Friday November 01, 2024 @07:19AM (#42015827)
What am I missing, what is the significance of this post? I did learn that it was code named "Project Banana".
Re:KDE Linux by ryanmcdonough on Friday November 01, 2024 @09:02AM (#42016534)
That KDE are making their own first party distribution to showcase KDE, as well as making the DE.
Re:KDE Linux by vntok on Friday November 01, 2024 @07:49AM (#42016011)
What of it?
Re:KDE Linux by brnt on Friday November 01, 2024 @07:54AM (#42016046)
When you appear to be copying another KDE project (Neon), it would be helpful to explain why.
Re:KDE Linux by sbuttgereit on Friday November 01, 2024 @08:03AM (#42016098)
From the bottom of the linked page:

"Prior art: KDE neon, KDE's first version of a self-made OS. KDE neon fulfills the "distributed by KDE" requirement, but fails on the reliability angle due to the Ubuntu LTS base that ironically becomes unstable because it needs to be tinkered with to get Plasma to build on it, breaking the LTS promise."

Re:KDE Linux by Y_Y on Friday November 01, 2024 @08:02AM (#42016096)
> Prior art

> KDE neon, KDE's first version of a self-made OS. KDE neon fulfills the "distributed by KDE" requirement, but fails on the reliability angle due to the Ubuntu LTS base that ironically becomes unstable because it needs to be tinkered with to get Plasma to build on it, breaking the LTS promise

Re:KDE Linux by TOGoS on Friday November 01, 2024 @08:29AM (#42016291)
I wish them luck.

My experience with KDE is limited to the early 200Xs, when it was one of the desktop options that came with Red Hat Linux. "This is great, everything works together, Konqueror is so much better than every other web browser" I recall thinking. It seemed like they had it all figured out already and I didn't understand why everything kept being reinvented, badly, for Gnome or whatever.

Re:KDE Linux by mikae1 on Friday November 01, 2024 @08:43AM (#42016398)
> Base OS is Arch-based

Considering they're aiming for reliability I would've liked if they'd built on a truly reliable atomic distro base.

https://getaurora.dev has been so damn good, but despite being a Plasma distro it still packs a lot of GTK apps from Bazzite for basic functionality.

Re:KDE Linux by snvzz on Friday November 01, 2024 @12:48PM (#42018875)
Arch was likely chosen because arch-based SteamOS has already pulled it off (immutable system including KDE).

Lets them waste less effort reinventing the wheel.

Re:KDE Linux by arunix on Friday November 01, 2024 @07:08PM (#42022444)
Is Aurora more stable than Fedora Kinoite?
Re:KDE Linux by mikae1 on Sunday November 03, 2024 @04:39PM (#42036290)
The Aurora image includes some necessities. The Aurora NVIDIA image includes drivers and should just work. You can theoretically also rebase to another version, such as Bazzite, with a different desktop environment.
Re:KDE Linux by jrepinc on Friday November 01, 2024 @03:17PM (#42020529)
BTW, to support further development of KDE Plasma desktop and KDE apps and all their awesome Free software, they are currently having an end-of-the-year fundraiser. Help if you can: https://kde.org/fundraisers/yearend2024/
Re:KDE Linux by LooseMarmoset on Wednesday November 06, 2024 @10:12PM (#42072971)
You know, I am way past the submit date on this, but I just discovered KDE Connect today. I'm using it to share stuff between iOS and my non-KDE desktop, and I had to plug it. It's wonderful!

That is all!