News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Boeing 787s must be reset every 51 days or 'misleading da... by HeyLaughingBoy on Thursday October 24, 2024 @06:43PM (#41940601)
Don't attribute to malice what can easily be explained by overstressed Systems Engineers trying to resolve multiple conflicting Requirements.
Re:Boeing 787s must be reset every 51 days or 'misleading da... by jcgrillo on Thursday October 24, 2024 @07:33PM (#41940886)
My point is there was absolutely no need for the System Engineers to touch the charging system. The normal analog diode rectifier variety that has been standard since the 1960s is Good Enough. No "Innovation" Needed. Take your spacecamp nerds elsewhere.
Re:Boeing 787s must be reset every 51 days or 'misleading da... by 4gotunameagain on Friday October 25, 2024 @12:33AM (#41942232)
Sure, you MUST know better than the BMW engineers who designed the feature we have zero information about.
Re:Boeing 787s must be reset every 51 days or 'misleading da... by Log_out_ on Friday October 25, 2024 @02:44AM (#41942827)
at this point anything is possible: they barely write the specs

https//www.heise.de/en/news/BMW-Huge-recall-and-profit-warning-due-to-defective-Conti-brakes-9864793.html

Re:Boeing 787s must be reset every 51 days or 'misleading da... by whatevaa on Friday October 25, 2024 @11:04AM (#41945960)
Engineers often do stuff without any thought of maintenance. Just ask mechanics/maintenance personnel.
Re:Boeing 787s must be reset every 51 days or 'misleading da... by 4gotunameagain on Friday October 25, 2024 @03:38PM (#41948848)
Having performed repairs on a BMW motorcycle, I am quite aware. It is a good point, but I highly doubt that it would play a role in this case. There must be something there that we are missing.
Re:Boeing 787s must be reset every 51 days or 'misleading da... by tdullien on Friday October 25, 2024 @09:37AM (#41945154)
"Somebody needed to get promoted"