Re:AWS data center latencies, visualized
by pclmulqdq on Thursday October 24, 2024 @07:39AM
(#41934543)
Starlink latencies sadly aren't competitive due to the routing paths it uses. And sadly there are currently no competitors to starlink.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AWS data center latencies, visualized
by matthewdgreen on Thursday October 24, 2024 @08:18AM
(#41934763)
The routing paths traveling via ground stations, you mean? My understanding is that they were experimenting with improvements to this, they just haven't deployed anything yet.
Re:AWS data center latencies, visualized
by pclmulqdq on Thursday October 24, 2024 @08:19AM
(#41934772)
No, even with proposed inter-satellite routing paths, they are too slow. The trading industry has very much done the math on this.
The comparison is against radio and hollow-core fiber, not conventional fiber.
Re:AWS data center latencies, visualized
by fragmede on Thursday October 24, 2024 @09:01AM
(#41935072)
Laser links between satellites have been active since late 2022, or was there some additional improvement you're referring to?
Re:AWS data center latencies, visualized
by pclmulqdq on Thursday October 24, 2024 @09:12AM
(#41935168)
I haven't kept track of that, but there is no other improvement. Even with the straightest possible laser links in space, they are too slow.
Re:AWS data center latencies, visualized
by sandworm101 on Thursday October 24, 2024 @08:38AM
(#41934899)
A radio will beat starlink on ping times. Even a simple ham bouncing a off the ionosphere can win out over an orbiting satellite, at least for the very small amounts of data needed for a trade order. The difficulty in such schemes is reliability, which can be hit-or-miss depending on a hundred factors.