How Much Science Is Fake?

Re:How Much Science Is Fake? by cynicalpeace on Monday October 21, 2024 @09:58AM (#41904225)

Fake is a good word. "unjustified and sloppy" is fake to me. We have different definitions of fake and shouldn't get hung up on definitions. My last word on it is I should be antagonistic against people who are deciding what goes in my son's school lunch based off of "unjustified and sloppy" studies.

First principles + received wisdom are counter balancing, not contradicting. Everything in life is a balance.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How Much Science Is Fake? by davisoneee on Monday October 21, 2024 @10:21AM (#41904491)

Definitions matter when it comes discussion, as what you say influences how people feel on a topic. Broad, non-specific definitions leave a lot of space for bias rather than clarity.

If you describe it as 'fake', I consider that to give the impression of 'the answer is NOT' this, and could lead to anti-policy.

If the description is 'unjustified and sloppy', that can lead to additional research to properly invalidate or potentially find something useful, so we don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How Much Science Is Fake? by cynicalpeace on Monday October 21, 2024 @11:02AM (#41904949)

We have different style. That's OK. Not everyone has to talk like a bureaucrat.

[ Parent | on HN ]