News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on AI Detectors Falsely Accuse Students of Cheating–With Big Consequences. Parent comment

Re:AI Detectors Falsely Accuse Students of Cheating–With Big... by tomjen3 on Monday October 21, 2024 @05:58AM (#41902449)
Simple: you still write an essay and you may use ai to do so. Then you throw the essay out and go and talk with the teacher about it. If you can answer intelligently it’s because you know the stuff and if not then you don’t.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AI Detectors Falsely Accuse Students of Cheating–With Big... by bearjaws on Monday October 21, 2024 @06:39AM (#41902689)
It's simple, just hire 4x as many teachers so they can spend time talking to and quizzing students!
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AI Detectors Falsely Accuse Students of Cheating–With Big... by prepend on Monday October 21, 2024 @07:46AM (#41903093)
I think it’s a good exception case for the 1% of false positives.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AI Detectors Falsely Accuse Students of Cheating–With Big... by lupire on Monday October 21, 2024 @08:59AM (#41903693)
Yes, it is simple. This already happens for AP exam grading, for example. Seasonal temporary graders.

Happens in tax filing too.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AI Detectors Falsely Accuse Students of Cheating–With Big... by PeterisP on Monday October 21, 2024 @05:34PM (#41908750)
Such an increase can actually be quite feasible; quadrupling the labor spent on final examination would be perhaps a 10% increase for the total labor spent on preparing and teaching a university course, and at university level (unlike earlier schooling) we don't really have a shortage of educators, quite the opposite.
[ Parent | on HN ]