Every story and comment from the Hacker News API, in a layout borrowed from 2001.
A comment on The logical fallacy at the core of patent law, what does non-obviousness test?. Parent comment
But the key idea stands: an inventor who invents something rare and non-obvious should be rewarded, supported, and encouraged to invent again. Or not?
There are no comments on this comment yet.
But the key idea stands: an inventor who invents something rare and non-obvious should be rewarded, supported, and encouraged to invent again. Or not?