Re:The logical fallacy at the core of patent law, what does ...
by volodymyrs on Saturday October 19, 2024 @06:40AM
(#41887016)
Its a matter of debate how much exclusivity should be granted and for how long.
But the key idea stands: an inventor who invents something rare and non-obvious should be rewarded, supported, and encouraged to invent again. Or not?
And I don't think it's about rewarding above-average inventors, but above-average inventions. That is, not every incremental change should grant an exclusive marketplace for over a decade.