Re:C++ proposal: There are 8 bits in a byte
by WalterBright on Friday October 18, 2024 @06:38PM
(#41884134)
> Type names with explicit sizes (u8, i32, etc) are way better in every way
Until one realizes that the entire namespace of innn, unnn, fnnn, etc., is reserved.
> and a big chunk of wasted time trying to abstract these away and getting it wrong anyway was saved. Millions of people cried out in relief!
Nah. It is actually pretty bad. Type names with explicit sizes (u8, i32, etc) are way better in every way.