Re:Psilocybin Bests SSRI for Major Depression in First Long-...
by phoronixrly on Saturday October 12, 2024 @12:23PM
(#41820249)
In my experience (this thread, too), the conversation gets polluted by people that swear by their self-medication and call more cautious people naysayers.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Psilocybin Bests SSRI for Major Depression in First Long-...
by feoren on Saturday October 12, 2024 @12:32PM
(#41820332)
How come every time we try to have a conversion, it always ends up all "point counterpoint" and "personal experience with the topic" and "differing personal experience" and "discussion of how those experiences relate to the topic"!? EVERY TIME!
Re:Psilocybin Bests SSRI for Major Depression in First Long-...
by DiscourseFan on Saturday October 12, 2024 @12:36PM
(#41820377)
Its almost as if all experience is subjective…
Re:Psilocybin Bests SSRI for Major Depression in First Long-...
by phoronixrly on Saturday October 12, 2024 @12:40PM
(#41820408)
The only valuable conversation about such research is an objective discussion of the quality of the study at hand.
Re:Psilocybin Bests SSRI for Major Depression in First Long-...
by worik on Saturday October 12, 2024 @03:55PM
(#41821968)
> The only valuable conversation about such research is an objective discussion of the quality of the study at hand.
No
People's lived experience is very useful
Re:Psilocybin Bests SSRI for Major Depression in First Long-...
by ants_everywhere on Saturday October 12, 2024 @05:28PM
(#41822812)
Those are called anecdotes.
Empirically, they're usually not nearly as useful as people think. People are on average unreliable observers of their own experiences.
Much better than individual anecdotes are collections of anecdotes that are searchable and somewhat categorized. A lot of old school drug forums provide this.
Much better still is systematically varying data and taking statistics to separate signal from noise.