Re:US weighs Google break-up in landmark antitrust case
by dehrmann on Wednesday October 09, 2024 @12:40PM
(#41789884)
It's an interesting argument for monopolies possibly being a net-good, but I don't think regulators really look at it. Companies do R&D because they like their monopoly status and don't want to be caught flat-footed by something new.
Re:US weighs Google break-up in landmark antitrust case
by ta1243 on Wednesday October 09, 2024 @04:19PM
(#41792189)
Yes. If a large company didn't employ those researchers, someone else would, and if they were for someone else maybe they'll come up with something which could damage the large company.
It's not about building and owning the next best thing, it's about preventing someone else building and owning the next best thing.
Re:US weighs Google break-up in landmark antitrust case
by mcmoor on Wednesday October 09, 2024 @07:11PM
(#41793795)
Well then the monopoly still isn't bad, because they can still be brought down solely by merit (just that no one have done it yet). Unlike government-enforced monopolies that'll stay no matter what they don't even have to do R&D.
Re:US weighs Google break-up in landmark antitrust case
by zaphar on Wednesday October 09, 2024 @01:52PM
(#41790736)
I am not at all confident that a government lab will be either well-funded or efficient in any sense of the words.
Re:US weighs Google break-up in landmark antitrust case
by 2OEH8eoCRo0 on Wednesday October 09, 2024 @03:31PM
(#41791750)
It'd be way more efficient and cost effective to just set up a well-funded government labs to do that research.