News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on On the Nature of Time. Parent comment

Re:On the Nature of Time by JumpCrisscross on Tuesday October 08, 2024 @10:31PM (#41783906)
> have experience, requires position relative to the all, the traversal of the all is time

You’re describing timelike experience. Photons “experience” events as in they are part of causality. But they do so in a non-timelike manner.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:On the Nature of Time by pyinstallwoes on Wednesday October 09, 2024 @06:13AM (#41786197)
Said a human.

If it’s not time-like, then it’s everything, thus it can’t have experiences thus god. God splits (monad becomes many) to experience being (shards in multiplicity of the one through division: oooh spooky golden mystery).

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:On the Nature of Time by CooCooCaCha on Wednesday October 09, 2024 @09:39AM (#41787857)
Take your meds
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:On the Nature of Time by pyinstallwoes on Wednesday October 09, 2024 @01:23PM (#41790376)
Take your meds
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:On the Nature of Time by phantompeace on Wednesday October 09, 2024 @07:04PM (#41793739)
I think he’s actually got a point. I have the same “feelings” but can’t articulate it in a scientific way compatible with physicists in general.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:On the Nature of Time by dang on Thursday October 10, 2024 @05:24PM (#41803731)
Personal attacks will get you banned here, so please don't do this.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

[ Parent | on HN ]