Re:Artist appeals copyright denial for prize-winning AI-gene...
by bluefirebrand on Tuesday October 08, 2024 @01:19AM
(#41774052)
Spending 100+ hours trying to coax the computer to produce the work you want isn't impressive. The idea that there is some huge amount of skill and theory behind writing prompts is absurd. It's not as though he spent 100+ hours crafting the perfect prompt with his skill and theory and the results were perfect first try. Be real: He spent 100+ hours writing dozens, perhaps hundreds of prompts, until it spat out the result he wanted. Prompting is a guess and test process, not a skill. Anyone claiming otherwise is deluded
I will never respect "prompters" as artists. No one should. A shallow dismissal is all they deserve
Re:Artist appeals copyright denial for prize-winning AI-gene...
by elpocko on Tuesday October 08, 2024 @05:18AM
(#41775289)
Doubling down on your ignorance, nice. It's refreshing to see that ignorance, intolerance and shitting on people's work becomes fashionable again. I hope this trend continues.
Photographers are not artists btw. They just point a lens and press a button. Anyone can do that, no skill required. I will never respect them.
Re:Artist appeals copyright denial for prize-winning AI-gene...
by bluefirebrand on Tuesday October 08, 2024 @09:31AM
(#41777193)
When someone writes prompts to commission a human artist to create a painting, we never even remotely consider them an artist
Why should we consider someone an artist when they write prompts to a computer to have it create paintings? It's clear that the painting is not being created by them
Continuing to draw this false equivalence between prompting and photography is not helping you. And simply replacing words in what I'm saying, mad-libs style, to parrot back to me, is not the own you think it is
The guy invested 100+ hours into creating one image. You should be ashamed of yourself for your shallow dismissal of his work.