Re:What is the history of the use of "foo" and "bar" in sour...
by __MatrixMan__ on Saturday October 05, 2024 @05:40PM
(#41753146)
In the 60's the belief was that they could not tolerate profanity. Or maybe it was that they'd tattle on the rest of us.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:What is the history of the use of "foo" and "bar" in sour...
by johnyzee on Saturday October 05, 2024 @07:03PM
(#41753533)
There was a concept of treating women with respect.
Re:What is the history of the use of "foo" and "bar" in sour...
by smcin on Saturday October 05, 2024 @08:53PM
(#41753938)
That's a non-sequitur. There are plenty of other words that start with 'fu-'. It's also a loanword from Chinese.
And even if not, I haven't heard anyone describe the coinage 'fupa' as offensive.
Re:What is the history of the use of "foo" and "bar" in sour...
by smcin on Saturday October 05, 2024 @11:49PM
(#41754611)
To the downvoters: I said I don't find merit in the suggestion that using 'fu' (or 'foo' as a function name) would be considered to constitute profanity. I simply learned 'foo, 'bar' and 'baz' as silly-sounding function names. I didn't make any connection from 'foo' in the CS context to 'fubar' in US military slang till decade later.
(Neglecting that there weren't many women in CS in the 1960s. I don't even see that the word-fragment would have been considered offensive in civilian context, esp. to non-US speakers of English)
Re:What is the history of the use of "foo" and "bar" in sour...
by dragonwriter on Saturday October 05, 2024 @09:02PM
(#41753978)
In the 60s, women were generally infantilized, but I suspect the “it was done for the women” explanation for the drift of “fu” to the already-existing term “foo” once separate from the other part of “fubar” is a just-so story, rather than a historical fact.