News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:PostScript 1.0 – A Code Study by kencausey on Friday October 04, 2024 @10:26PM (#41747281)
I'm curious about the history of the base language reportedly designed at Evans & Sutherland 1971ish. I couldn't turn up much in the few minutes of searching I did. If anyone can provide links to papers or anything on this subject I would appreciate it.
Re:PostScript 1.0 – A Code Study by jwstarr on Saturday October 05, 2024 @05:25PM (#41753042)
As a a starting point, "The Origins of PostScript" (https://gwern.net/doc/design/typography/2018-warnock.pdf) provides a few details on the language and Gaffney's involvement. Warnock's oral history for the Computer History Museum (https://www.computerhistory.org/collections/catalog/10273875...) also includes the story. Gaffney's patent provides the most detail but, unfortunately, it is written as a patent rather than a language description.

The DoD DTIC service has a couple of reports that cover the Harbor Pilot Simulation, but I haven't found any reports written by E&S. The Computer History Museum has some records from Evans and Sutherland, but I don't think any of them cover the language.

Re:PostScript 1.0 – A Code Study by kencausey on Sunday October 06, 2024 @12:28PM (#41758226)
Thanks, but I saw that much, I should have been clearer. I'm hoping for something on the scale of a survey if not a paper.

Honestly, my first curiosity regards whether Chuck Moore and Forth get any mention or whether this is a true parallel development, possibly necessitated by the hardware at hand. My perception, based on zero evidence, was that Forth had some influence on the design of Postscript.

Re:PostScript 1.0 – A Code Study by tln on Tuesday October 08, 2024 @02:08PM (#41780093)
Apparently not. From "The Origins of PostScript" mentioned by GP:

> The architecture suggested by John Gaffney was to be based on a fictitious stack machine (at that time we had no knowledge of a similar approach taken by the Forth language).

That is the only mention of "Forth".

Re:PostScript 1.0 – A Code Study by fanf2 on Tuesday October 08, 2024 @03:16PM (#41780752)
That led me to this presentation on the Eidophor projector https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-BvMcqEc98
Re:PostScript 1.0 – A Code Study by twoodfin on Wednesday October 09, 2024 @07:53AM (#41786869)
Is that oral history actually available for download?
Re:PostScript 1.0 – A Code Study by Rotundo on Wednesday October 09, 2024 @12:32PM (#41789788)
Yes, there is a link to a PDF containing a transcript in the page linked by the post above.