New research says blue zones can be explained by comically flawed data

Re:New research says blue zones can be explained by comicall... by taeric on Friday October 04, 2024 @07:13PM (#41746379)

What topic are you suggesting to search on Pubmed? I have yet to see anything that supports some places have places with exceptionally long lived people. Especially to the massive outlier values that is often put forth. (So, 105 is not that crazy of a number to consider. 110, however, already starts to stretch credibility quite heavily.)

(Leaving discussion of the ignobel to the other thread.)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:New research says blue zones can be explained by comicall... by giantg2 on Friday October 04, 2024 @07:34PM (#41746467)

You missed the entire point of blue zone research - the recommended areas to research. Stuff like diet, exercise, community, etc.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:New research says blue zones can be explained by comicall... by taeric on Friday October 04, 2024 @07:50PM (#41746561)

So link me a single bloody paper that goes over this? Searching "blue zones" on pubmed shows mainly things older than this paper. And a lot of stuff that, frankly, feels highly suspicious.

Similarly, if there are places that have debunked this paper, link one. It is a genuinely interesting topic to read about.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:New research says blue zones can be explained by comicall... by giantg2 on Saturday October 05, 2024 @07:46AM (#41749233)

Please see the comment history for my opinion on blue zones, a link, and the areas to search on Pubmed. You can even find the areas of blue zone recommendations in TFA. You're not supposed to search for blue zones, but for studies on those recommendations (plant heavy or mederteranian diets, exercise, etc).

[ Parent | on HN ]