Re:Liquefied natural gas carbon footprint is worse than coal
by incrudible on Friday October 04, 2024 @02:09PM
(#41744008)
Arguably, but the resolution is in the first paragraph. When it comes to energy and emissions the whole situation must be taken into account. For example, a country like Germany that bet big on renewables needs natural gas to buffer the volatility, and ever since the Russian invasion they rely a lot more on LNG. That said, coal ouput can't be quickly regulated like natural gas, so the situation is even more complicated.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Liquefied natural gas carbon footprint is worse than coal
by Sohcahtoa82 on Friday October 04, 2024 @02:42PM
(#41744311)
> Arguably, but the resolution is in the first paragraph.
True, but how many people read articles versus responding to just the headlines?
It's visible even on HN.