News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Who Pays for the Arts? by nemo44x on Thursday October 03, 2024 @02:34PM (#41733512)
> So what?

It's arbitrary and unfair.

> This is essentially the same mechanism used in the provision of universal primary education;

I don't know if giving free money to adults who consider themselves artists is the same as ensuring children have access to vital education services. Educating children also ensures there's more a chance they'll contribute rather than be a client/dependent of the state.

Why doesn't the state fund everyone's hobby? I play golf - they should subsidize some of my greens fees. I might end up writing an amazing book that uses my golf experience to push a narrative about the different types of people you meet on a golf course, but we're all "just people" or some nonsense. You never know, it might become a cherished cultural artifact.

Re:Who Pays for the Arts? by ninalanyon on Thursday October 03, 2024 @04:22PM (#41734576)
> Why doesn't the state fund everyone's hobby?

Yes, why not?

Re:Who Pays for the Arts? by nemo44x on Thursday October 03, 2024 @11:36PM (#41737555)
Perfect! But instead of giving people money they didn’t earn we’ll instead cut taxes so people have more take home money to pursue the things they’d like to.
Re:Who Pays for the Arts? by ninalanyon on Tuesday October 15, 2024 @11:53AM (#41849843)
Cutting taxes doesn't help someone who doesn't have any money.
Re:Who Pays for the Arts? by screye on Sunday October 06, 2024 @12:31PM (#41758253)
I agree with your premise, but golf is a bad example.

Golf is heavily subsidized. It's the poster child of a sport that wouldn't exist if it had to pay fair taxes or abide by free market pressures.

There are a handful of activities that cater to the elite like an 'artist subsidy'. Golf makes the list.