News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by cdolan on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @10:54PM (#41726910)
So wordpress.org is effectively for-profit

Why did your legal officer today post in a blog post that its a non-profit?

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by fhfhfhjfnfnfmf on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @11:02PM (#41726962)
What blog was this?

Matt’s agents post in so many different places it’s hard to keep track.

Edit: found it. Wow. This guy has the worst lawyers. https://automattic.com/2024/10/02/wordpress-trademarks-a-leg...

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by function_seven on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @11:55PM (#41727236)
I love how he explains that “consideration” was conjured from thin air.

I own a car. I want to drive my own car on weekdays. To accomplish this, I give my car to Jimmy, and he promises to let me use it on weekdays?

Using the same analogy as in that post, apparently this is a valid contract with “consideration” because I gave Jimmy my car and, “in return,” he gave me my car back Monday–Friday.

I’m no lawyer, but I can’t imagine that it is illegal to donate a noncommercial license to a nonprofit organization, without contracts and considerations coming into play. But if I’m wrong, and “consideration” is a required element of a transaction like this, I don’t think this wash-sale version of it would pass muster anyway.

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by neltnerb on Thursday October 03, 2024 @01:33AM (#41727631)
I also do not get it, I don't know why consideration is even relevant for a donation.

I assume someone wanted to restructure things so that a fully owned trademark was owned by a non-profit instead, with them retaining commercial rights.

Why would either side want to minimize the donation size? It reduces taxes for the commercial company and the non-profit doesn't care about income tax.

I don't know if the site is accurate but it's odd to bring up considerations for sure. I don't see anything immoral or unethical about want to restructure so that a non-profit handles the non-profit stuff.

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by cdolan on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @11:22PM (#41727064)
You start to wonder if they work for WPE
Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by ChallengeEup237 on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @11:34PM (#41727139)
There are so many legal entities here that appear completely intertwined: The WordPress Foundation, Automattic, Audrey Capital, WordPress Community Support PBC, etc. Conflicts of interest are a problem even if they aren't acted upon. It's going to get ugly.
Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by jonnypants83 on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @11:47PM (#41727203)
the statements about the non-profit situation seem especially bad. He'll obviously have his own side of the story, but I'm guessing they didn't misread the tax filings.
Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by FireBeyond on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @11:46PM (#41727199)
Right. To me Matt is so so used to using them all almost synonymously that he seems oblivious to the ramifications thereof.