Re:The Netherlands has returned some stolen artifacts to Ind...
by rightbyte on Tuesday October 01, 2024 @11:52AM
(#41710029)
Mummies are maybe a bad example, as one could argue, that bodies should be by their grave.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Netherlands has returned some stolen artifacts to Ind...
by bell-cot on Tuesday October 01, 2024 @12:28PM
(#41710625)
Or a perfect example - because there are extremely few cultures and circumstances in which very old human graves are moved when the government or rulers changed?
Re:The Netherlands has returned some stolen artifacts to Ind...
by nickff on Tuesday October 01, 2024 @02:26PM
(#41712221)
Graves generally aren't permanent; most plots are leased for a fixed term. What is done with the caskets and contents thereafter varies widely.
Re:The Netherlands has returned some stolen artifacts to Ind...
by cuteboy19 on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @02:28AM
(#41717753)
Is that really how pyramids worked? King Tut in the pyramid for 60 years then to the Nile his bones?
Re:The Netherlands has returned some stolen artifacts to Ind...
by bloak on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @11:31AM
(#41721658)
It sort of worked like that, though that wasn't the intention? By which I mean, as I understand it, all the pyramids were robbed a very long time ago, but Tutankhamun's tomb survived undisturbed until the 20th century because it wasn't in a pyramid.