News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047. Parent comment

Re:Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047 by FeepingCreature on Monday September 30, 2024 @05:41AM (#41695276)
> I don't know about being a major advocate, the last I read was "cautious support" [1]. Perhaps Anthropic sees Llama as a bigger competitor of theirs than I do, but it could also just be PR.

This seems a curious dichotomy. Can we at least consider the possibility that they mean the words they say or is that off the table?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047 by worstspotgain on Monday September 30, 2024 @07:57AM (#41696173)
Just two spitballing conjectures, not meant to be a dichotomy. If you have first-hand knowledge please contribute.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047 by ForOldHack on Tuesday October 01, 2024 @01:28PM (#41711475)
One of the very most apt descriptions. One company trying to raise alarms about another company in the same business. I have been following this since IBM released $67,000 "Intellect" "Business Intelligence." and Lotus HAL.
[ Parent | on HN ]