Re:Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047
by FeepingCreature on Monday September 30, 2024 @05:41AM
(#41695276)
> I don't know about being a major advocate, the last I read was "cautious support" [1]. Perhaps Anthropic sees Llama as a bigger competitor of theirs than I do, but it could also just be PR.
This seems a curious dichotomy. Can we at least consider the possibility that they mean the words they say or is that off the table?
Re:Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047
by worstspotgain on Monday September 30, 2024 @07:57AM
(#41696173)
Just two spitballing conjectures, not meant to be a dichotomy. If you have first-hand knowledge please contribute.
Re:Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047
by ForOldHack on Tuesday October 01, 2024 @01:28PM
(#41711475)
One of the very most apt descriptions. One company trying to raise alarms about another company in the same business. I have been following this since IBM released $67,000 "Intellect" "Business Intelligence." and Lotus HAL.
Well, we'll see what passes again and when. By then there'll be more kittens out of the bag too.
> Anthropic was a major advocate for it.
I don't know about being a major advocate, the last I read was "cautious support" [1]. Perhaps Anthropic sees Llama as a bigger competitor of theirs than I do, but it could also just be PR.
[1] https://thejournal.com/articles/2024/08/26/anthropic-offers-...