Show HN: Bringing multithreading to Python's async event loop

Re:Show HN: Bringing multithreading to Python's async event ... by quotemstr on Saturday September 28, 2024 @11:17PM (#41684598)

I hear that some Amish sects permit the use of technology that's older and proven not to be too worldly, like washing machines, chainsaws, and Java 11. Have you considered converting?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: Bringing multithreading to Python's async event ... by drowsspa on Monday September 30, 2024 @03:41PM (#41701208)

Yeah... Unfortunately golden handcuffs are binding me to the financial sector and, specifically, to Hadoop

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: Bringing multithreading to Python's async event ... by fnord123 on Thursday October 03, 2024 @04:28AM (#41728503)

Hadoop >=3.3 supports Java11.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: Bringing multithreading to Python's async event ... by svieira on Thursday October 03, 2024 @11:29AM (#41731681)

Virtual threads only became stable in Java 21, unfortunately (https://openjdk.org/jeps/444). If the issue is "I'm bound to Java 8" proposing running a research build of Java 11 in production is going to fly as well as a lead balloon on the moon.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: Bringing multithreading to Python's async event ... by drowsspa on Friday October 04, 2024 @05:37AM (#41739580)

Even so, it's pretty new, isn't it? I don't quite trust the claim it's completely transparent to applications and libraries...

[ Parent | on HN ]