News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Show HN: Bringing multithreading to Python's async event loop. Parent comment

Re:Show HN: Bringing multithreading to Python's async event ... by drowsspa on Saturday September 28, 2024 @05:30PM (#41683134)
Not for those of us stuck in Java 8... Is it stable already?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Show HN: Bringing multithreading to Python's async event ... by quotemstr on Saturday September 28, 2024 @11:17PM (#41684598)
I hear that some Amish sects permit the use of technology that's older and proven not to be too worldly, like washing machines, chainsaws, and Java 11. Have you considered converting?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Show HN: Bringing multithreading to Python's async event ... by drowsspa on Monday September 30, 2024 @03:41PM (#41701208)
Yeah... Unfortunately golden handcuffs are binding me to the financial sector and, specifically, to Hadoop
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Show HN: Bringing multithreading to Python's async event ... by fnord123 on Thursday October 03, 2024 @04:28AM (#41728503)
Hadoop >=3.3 supports Java11.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Show HN: Bringing multithreading to Python's async event ... by svieira on Thursday October 03, 2024 @11:29AM (#41731681)
Virtual threads only became stable in Java 21, unfortunately (https://openjdk.org/jeps/444). If the issue is "I'm bound to Java 8" proposing running a research build of Java 11 in production is going to fly as well as a lead balloon on the moon.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Show HN: Bringing multithreading to Python's async event ... by drowsspa on Friday October 04, 2024 @05:37AM (#41739580)
Even so, it's pretty new, isn't it? I don't quite trust the claim it's completely transparent to applications and libraries...
[ Parent | on HN ]