Re:I Am Tired of AI
by ipaio on Friday September 27, 2024 @05:53AM
(#41668256)
You can prompt/train the AI to add a couple of random minor errors. They're trained from human text after all, they can pretend to be as human as you like.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I Am Tired of AI
by eleveriven on Friday September 27, 2024 @06:40AM
(#41668645)
Making it feel like there's no reliable way to discern what's truly human
Re:I Am Tired of AI
by vouaobrasil on Friday September 27, 2024 @07:03AM
(#41668847)
There is. Be vehemently against AI, put 100% AI free in your work. The more consistent you are against AI, the more likely people will believe you. Write articles slamming AI. Personally, I am 100% against AI and I state that loud and clear on my blogs and YouTube channel. I HATE AI.
Hate to tell you but there is nothing stopping people using AI from doing the same thing.
Re:I Am Tired of AI
by vouaobrasil on Friday September 27, 2024 @07:52AM
(#41669280)
AI cannot build up a sufficient level of trust, especially if you are known in person by others who will vouch for you. That web of trust is hard to break with AI. And I am one of those.
Are you including transformer based translation models like Google Translate or Deepl in your categorical AI rejectio?
Re:I Am Tired of AI
by vouaobrasil on Friday September 27, 2024 @11:30AM
(#41671707)
Yeah.
The funny thing is that the things it refuses to say are "wrong-speech" type stuff, so the only things you can be more sure of nowadays are conspiracy theories and other nasty stuff. The nastier the more likely it's human written, which is a bit ironic.
Re:I Am Tired of AI
by matteoraso on Friday September 27, 2024 @06:31AM
(#41668574)
No, you can finetune locally hosted LLMs to be nasty.
Maybe the future of creative writing is fine tuning your own unique form of nastiness
> The nastier the more likely it's human written, which is a bit ironic.
This is as everything else, machine produced has a flawlessness along some dimension that humans tend to lack.
Barring simple typos, human mistakes are erroneous intention from a single source. You can't simply write human vagaries off as 'error' because they're glimpses into a picture of intention that is perhaps misguided.
I'm listening to a slightly wonky early James Brown instrumental right now, and there's certainly a lot more error than you'd get in sequenced computer music (or indeed generated music) but the force with which humans wrest the wonkiness toward an idea of groove is palpable. Same with Zeppelin's 'Communication Breakdown' (I'm doing a groove analysis project, ok?).
I can't program the AI to have intention, nor can you. If you do, hello Skynet, and it's time you started thinking about how to be nice to it, or else :)