Re:U.S. court orders LibGen to pay $30M to publishers, issue...
by kevin_thibedeau on Thursday September 26, 2024 @06:33PM
(#41664237)
You only need a dynamic-DNS system on the hidden service. Then you can avoid the regulatory capture of registrars and host in a friendly country.
Re:U.S. court orders LibGen to pay $30M to publishers, issue...
by wkat4242 on Friday September 27, 2024 @12:30AM
(#41666264)
For now. Right now DNS blocking is used because it works for 95% of people. Once it doesn't, they'll start demanding more serious means of blocking.
I'm surprised that didn't happen yet because DNS blocking is so ineffective. It's basically just akin to removing a business from the phone book or yellow pages.
Re:U.S. court orders LibGen to pay $30M to publishers, issue...
by popcalc on Thursday September 26, 2024 @07:21PM
(#41664628)
AA is purely an indexer, the performance hit would be more felt during the actual downloads.
Re:U.S. court orders LibGen to pay $30M to publishers, issue...
by bawolff on Friday September 27, 2024 @04:52AM
(#41667827)
We're are talking about PDFs. A few mb usually. The speed hit of tor is probably fine. Also its a text book. Most users probably find some download latency acceptable.
I imagine the real reason is normies dont have tor installed.
Re:U.S. court orders LibGen to pay $30M to publishers, issue...
by cudgy on Friday September 27, 2024 @07:26AM
(#41669059)
Not a fan of the term “normies” but as a Tor “normie” isn’t Tor traffic identifiable and wouldn’t using it make it easier for authorities to focus on you?
Re:U.S. court orders LibGen to pay $30M to publishers, issue...
by bawolff on Friday September 27, 2024 @01:10PM
(#41673074)
Yes, but in most western juridsictions using tor is acceptable so that is fine.
There are ways to disguise traffic (onfuscated bridges) but those are always going to be an arms race.
> Why aren't Libgen, Annas-Archive, and others operating solely as an onion service on TOR?
Probably because that would make it less accessible and more slow.