Re:OpenAI to Become For-Profit Company
by widerporst on Thursday September 26, 2024 @08:16AM
(#41657463)
The fact that this has just disappeared from the front page for me, just like the previous post (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41651548), somehow leaves a bitter taste in my mouth.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:OpenAI to Become For-Profit Company
by mattcollins on Thursday September 26, 2024 @08:28AM
(#41657579)
I noticed that, too. It does seem 'odd'.
https://hnrankings.info/41655954/
Looks like it was flagged, before being brought back by an admin. This happens quite often.
Re:OpenAI to Become For-Profit Company
by lolinder on Thursday September 26, 2024 @09:31AM
(#41658191)
The previous post never entered the front page at all:
https://hnrankings.info/41651548/
It somehow got enough attention to get to 300+ votes while being entirely suppressed from the front page.
This one looks like it triggered a flag before being fixed:
Re:OpenAI to Become For-Profit Company
by jjulius on Thursday September 26, 2024 @09:43AM
(#41658316)
I found this on the front page an hour after you made this comment.
Re:OpenAI to Become For-Profit Company
by davidcbc on Thursday September 26, 2024 @09:50AM
(#41658389)
You can't post content critical of some HN darlings without being flagged by their fans
Re:OpenAI to Become For-Profit Company
by jjulius on Thursday September 26, 2024 @09:58AM
(#41658479)
How do you explain all of the constant unflagged criticism of OpenAI and Sam Altman throughout nearly every OpenAI thread? I mean, look around at all of the comments here...
Re:OpenAI to Become For-Profit Company
by financetechbro on Thursday September 26, 2024 @10:00AM
(#41658495)
Mods, probably
Re:OpenAI to Become For-Profit Company
by Davidzheng on Thursday September 26, 2024 @09:52AM
(#41658409)
Yeah hope for some transparency here
Re:OpenAI to Become For-Profit Company
by nitsuaeekcm on Thursday September 26, 2024 @01:15PM
(#41660842)
Look at the URL. It’s because the original WSJ title was “OpenAI Chief Technology Officer Resigns,” which was a dupe of yesterday’s discussions. WSJ changed the title yesterday evening.