News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NASA spacecraft to probe possibility of life in Europa's ... by protomolecule on Wednesday September 25, 2024 @09:33AM (#41647334)
The liquid will freeze back behind the probe.
Re:NASA spacecraft to probe possibility of life in Europa's ... by cookingmyserver on Wednesday September 25, 2024 @09:36AM (#41647368)
Correct, hence the need for the probe to unroll the cable as it goes down. If you had the roll on the surface, you would need to heat the whole cable to allow it to slip down.
Re:NASA spacecraft to probe possibility of life in Europa's ... by protomolecule on Wednesday September 25, 2024 @09:46AM (#41647490)
Which would require much more power than a single RITEG.
Re:NASA spacecraft to probe possibility of life in Europa's ... by arethuza on Wednesday September 25, 2024 @10:16AM (#41647815)
Why - 25km of fibre isn't that large?
Re:NASA spacecraft to probe possibility of life in Europa's ... by jdiez17 on Wednesday September 25, 2024 @12:19PM (#41649050)
Back of the envelope feasibility check: assume the cable is a cylinder with diameter = 1cm, length = 25km. The area of the cylinder face is A = 2*pi*r*h = 785.4 m^2. The thermal conductivity of water ice is approx. 2.3 W / (m K). So to maintain a temperature difference of 10 K with the ice, you need 2.3 W/mK * 785 * 10 = approximately 18kW.
Re:NASA spacecraft to probe possibility of life in Europa's ... by arethuza on Wednesday September 25, 2024 @12:44PM (#41649276)
I was assuming something little thicker than optical fibre - the "probe" could be self powered using an RTG with the "waste" heat doing the melting?

Once the ice freezes again behind the probe it would protect the fibre... perhaps?

Fortunately something like that wouldn't be too difficult to test on Earth - probe recovery might be tricky though.

Re:NASA spacecraft to probe possibility of life in Europa's ... by nick238 on Wednesday September 25, 2024 @03:10PM (#41650846)
A mini nuclear-reactor-as-a-heat-source might be appropriate for a melt-drill. RTGs are a bit unfortunate as they'll exponentially decay from the time of manufacturing, and you'll need to both 1. deliver high enough power at Europa, and 2. radiate away that much power and a bit more when you're flying there.

A nuclear reactor could produce basically no heat while offline, then be switched on and suddenly provide 100s of kW when it gets to wherever it's going. The hard part in space is radiating away the heat, but if you're on an ice world, that's orders of magnitude easier.

The hardest part I'd see would just be getting into the ice; there's not really any "melting" in vacuum. The constant boiling away of the water would keep insulating your heater from the ice. Meters 1 to 20,000 are probably pretty easy.

Re:NASA spacecraft to probe possibility of life in Europa's ... by knodi123 on Wednesday September 25, 2024 @07:02PM (#41652776)
Or design the cable along the same principles as one of these,

https://www.walmart.com/c/kp/water-wiggler-toy

So it can "slip down" by a continuous unrolling process!

Re:NASA spacecraft to probe possibility of life in Europa's ... by XorNot on Wednesday September 25, 2024 @12:37PM (#41649218)
Europa is hard vacuum on the surface, so this is not actually intuitively obvious: i.e. if you built up a gaseous steam interface between the bore hole walls, then you might have quite a bit of trouble losing heat back into the surrounding ice.

In fact you could just boil the water to steam and vent it out the top via a surface valve assembly - the interior would act like a vacuum thermace flask.