News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Sanding UI. Parent comment

Re:Sanding UI by xorcist on Sunday September 22, 2024 @04:25AM (#41615552)
"Waterfall" is not a development process. But plenty of the processes that give space for planning, also give space for QA. So surely agile, in the broad sense of development processes, is relevant to the comparison.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sanding UI by ahoka on Sunday September 22, 2024 @05:56AM (#41615974)
A development process is not either Agile or “waterfall” anyway.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sanding UI by beryilma on Sunday September 22, 2024 @05:09PM (#41620092)
By all "software engineering" books' definition, Waterfall is a software/development process. Good or bad...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sanding UI by xorcist on Tuesday September 24, 2024 @08:07AM (#41635646)
Which book describes "waterfall" as an actual process, as opposed to something generally slow and bad?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sanding UI by beryilma on Tuesday September 24, 2024 @05:43PM (#41641257)
Being an actual process and being slow and bad are not opposites of each other. Literally, every recent software engineering book has a section on the "Waterfall Process". Nobody claims waterfall is good, but it is a software development process.
[ Parent | on HN ]