Re:House committee approves bill requiring new cars to have ...
by 7e on Thursday September 19, 2024 @06:44PM
(#41597115)
AM transmissions have a far greater range than FM transmissions, up to thousands of miles. This matters in a common emergency scenario, a nuclear bomb blast (or all out nuclear war), when EMPs will take out most electronics. Cars are Faraday cages and their electronics will likely survive an EMP. In this case, an AM radio in a car is likely the last surviving broadcast medium people will have access to.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:House committee approves bill requiring new cars to have ...
by howard941 on Thursday September 19, 2024 @07:05PM
(#41597255)
This only works if the AM antenna is protected, inside the Faraday cage, next to the radio. Otherwise you're left with a fried front end.
Re:House committee approves bill requiring new cars to have ...
by Vecr on Thursday September 19, 2024 @09:07PM
(#41597860)
Unless there's some really fast surge protection, and then a temporary disconnect for the later, longer pulses.
Re:House committee approves bill requiring new cars to have ...
by 7e on Thursday September 19, 2024 @10:02PM
(#41598139)
A fair point, but there's no need to have the antenna connected unless the radio is actively on. It could be on a relay. Many radios would be off during the EMP.
Re:House committee approves bill requiring new cars to have ...
by Vecr on Thursday September 19, 2024 @10:30PM
(#41598266)
Yeah, that's a better idea. Use a signal relay rated for the surge, and just have it off usually.
Re:House committee approves bill requiring new cars to have ...
by FireBeyond on Thursday September 19, 2024 @09:35PM
(#41598015)
In the event of a nuclear bomb blast or nuclear war, assuming that the plan isn't out and out annihilation, even then, communications infrastructure is going to be a strategic target.