Re:Sonic.net CEO: We Delete User Logs After Two Weeks. Your ...
by dfischer on Monday June 25, 2012 @06:46PM
(#4159165)
I wish we had Sonic in SoCal. Only option is basically Comcast and they fucking suck.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Sonic.net CEO: We Delete User Logs After Two Weeks. Your ...
by heretohelp on Monday June 25, 2012 @07:54PM
(#4159374)
Don't be too jealous, I'm in Mountain View and despite being a few blocks away from Google I have the same options. It's baffling.
Only SF realistically has Sonic available to them. Supposedly some backwater in Central Valley has it too.
Re:Sonic.net CEO: We Delete User Logs After Two Weeks. Your ...
by jrockway on Tuesday June 26, 2012 @04:03AM
(#4160758)
Most people I know in Mountain View have the Comcast Business internet connection, which is basically a different company from Comcast. (Different customer service, different billing, different equipment, etc.) Apparently you can even negotiate the rate down to $75 a month, which is a lot less than I pay for Time Warner's "we are a monopoly so fuck you with a stick" package in Brooklyn.
Re:Sonic.net CEO: We Delete User Logs After Two Weeks. Your ...
by dfischer on Wednesday June 27, 2012 @03:30PM
(#4168784)
Why does this monopoly exist? Is it related to law? Or is it related to needing a massive infrastructure to support such a business? Why can't a company "start-up" to offer fast competition in a city like Los Angeles?
Re:Sonic.net CEO: We Delete User Logs After Two Weeks. Your ...
by dmckeon on Monday June 25, 2012 @08:47PM
(#4159551)
In theory, they can serve most of the state:
http://www.sonic.net/sales/maps/
but in practice, DSL distance limits apply.
I would expect most densely populated areas
of the northern SF bay counties, most especially
the Santa Rosa area to be well served. OTOH, the
805(SLO) & 661(Bfd) area codes appear to be lagging.