Look at what's going on in Ukraine, if you can't tell a good from a bad shit you have to get your eyes checked. Hitting a column of tank isn't the same as targeting a civilian building
Wars are always bad and there will always be war crimes on all sides, it doesn't mean that everything is equal
Is this supposed to be a gotcha ?
WW2 is the reason we updated the Geneva conventions to protect civilians lol
Hamas / Hezbullah use civilians as human shields for their cause and cry wolf when they are harmed.
If you are a member of a terrorist organisation, someone is probably looking for you or your kind. They want to kill you on sight. Why would you then subject innocents to danger by being close with them while you are also a target?
Do terrorists deserve a "family break" where they are untouchable?
Siding with the losing side at any cost is a terrible heuristic.
If there are civilian / innocent casualties, that is sad, but if the target blends into the public life willingly as a defense mechanism that means it is a risk they are actively willing to take. Send your anger towards them for doing so.
Then they also die/get injured. Being in close contact with a terrorist is a dangerous pass-time, and armies targeting foreign threats need to accept some level of collateral damage. In this case, we have thousands of injured terrorists, with hundreds dead, and an additional fraction of those numbers being non-military targets (civilians). It's certainly unfortunate and unpleasant, but this is an excellent ratio.
It's never justified to trigger explosives when you have no idea where said explosives are.
What if the dude if hugging is kid/wife/mom ?
What if he's picking up his kids from school, visiting the local food market, &c.
What if he's driving and end up crashing in a bunch of people walking on the sidewalk