Re:Scientific American Endorses Kamala Harris
by litoE on Monday September 16, 2024 @07:17PM
(#41562218)
I have always believed that sharpiegate was the result of Trump being told the Bahamas would be hit by the hurricane (they were), him misunderstanding it as Alabama and later being incapable of admitting his mistake.
Re:Scientific American Endorses Kamala Harris
by joelaaronseely on Monday September 16, 2024 @05:11PM
(#41560965)
You can have my cup of koolaid - I'm not thirsty.
Re:Scientific American Endorses Kamala Harris
by AnimalMuppet on Monday September 16, 2024 @05:13PM
(#41560989)
> anything that goes against Big Oil is first on the chopping block.
You realize that the US is producing the most oil in history under the current administration, right?
Re:Scientific American Endorses Kamala Harris
by tzs on Monday September 16, 2024 @07:20PM
(#41562246)
The Biden administration's approach to energy is mostly an "all of the above" approach. Expand oil and natural gas, expand solar and wind, promote more efficient cars and appliances, encourage EVs, etc.
The Trump approach is to expand oil, gas, and coal and hostility to wind, solar, and efficient cars and appliances.
Re:Scientific American Endorses Kamala Harris
by blastonico on Monday September 16, 2024 @06:48PM
(#41561968)
But current administration does it with love and DEI.
Taking a stand now is the bare minimum. Assuming the GOP wins, it's game over for a lot of science in the US - anything that goes against Big Oil is first on the chopping block. Always remember Sharpiegate [1], that was just an indication of what will come.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Dorian%E2%80%93Alaba...