News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Meta fed its AI on everything adults have publicly posted... by squigz on Friday September 13, 2024 @05:33PM (#41535381)
> Is there?

The difference is that talking about a framework with passion doesn't generally end up with severe real world consequences for other people.

The difference between tech and people is that people are... people. They have lives, feelings, all those fun human things. Passionately talking about how X group of people should die (or <insert rhetoric of your choice>) is quite different than passionately talking about how Y framework is the worst thing programmers have ever concocted. Generally the latter won't end up with someone getting stabbed. (Generally...)

> What if Facebook, instead, said "Fat workers are too bloated, you should hire skinny workers"? Or if HN said "so and so projects are all ____ and they should all be ____, and oh, your vacuum doesn't suck".

I think this is a terribly unfair switcharoo to make. Let's fill in the blanks for that second quote.

> "so and so group of people are all inhuman and they should all be killed, and oh, your mom sucks"

> "so and so projects are all terrible and they should all be deleted, and oh, your vacuum doesn't suck"

Re:Meta fed its AI on everything adults have publicly posted... by randomdata on Saturday September 14, 2024 @03:37AM (#41538164)
> Generally the latter won't end up with someone getting stabbed.

A technology may not be literally stabbed, but I think it is fair to say that it very well may get stabbed metaphorically. It may even lead to the complete demise of the technology.

Passionately calling for the death of Next.js isn't really any different than calling for the death of a person, other than you may perceive it as being different if you hold people more dear than technology. But, in that case, that's just your arbitrary opinion that means nothing to anything other than you. There are no doubt some who would be more concerned about the loss of Next.js (bad example; nobody would miss Next.js, but you get the idea) than the loss of a person, which is equally valid. The true arbiter of truth, the universe, certainly doesn't have greater feelings towards one than the other.

Re:Meta fed its AI on everything adults have publicly posted... by squigz on Saturday September 14, 2024 @03:43AM (#41538184)
> Passionately calling for the death of Next.js isn't really any different than calling for the death of a person

I love these HN takes.

Re:Meta fed its AI on everything adults have publicly posted... by randomdata on Saturday September 14, 2024 @03:45AM (#41538190)
Of course. You clearly demonstrate an interest in people, so it plays to your passions. Thanks for sharing the obvious.
Re:Meta fed its AI on everything adults have publicly posted... by squigz on Saturday September 14, 2024 @03:48AM (#41538214)
> But not everyone has concern for them. They are actually quite uninteresting.

Well, you certainly are.

Re:Meta fed its AI on everything adults have publicly posted... by randomdata on Saturday September 14, 2024 @03:53AM (#41538228)
From passionate love to complete disinterest in a matter seconds. Interesting.

Admittedly, when you consider people as a technology, one does start to wonder what it would take to fix the glaring bugs. But then that questions if the technology provides enough value to bother with at all.

Re:Meta fed its AI on everything adults have publicly posted... by squigz on Saturday September 14, 2024 @12:01PM (#41540674)
Yeah yeah, humans are silly broken machines, the universe is indifferent, you're very edgy and smart.
Re:Meta fed its AI on everything adults have publicly posted... by randomdata on Saturday September 14, 2024 @04:03PM (#41542425)
For what reason would someone who is edgy and smart spend time writing messages to a computer program? Those who are edgy and smart, hell even just passingly typical, can go out into the real world and find actual friends.