It's healthy not to care too much about the fashion judgments of others, as you're suggesting. Is I agree with your first line. But you're otherwise bringing too black-and-white an approach to what is, in my view, an unavoidable part of social life.
Edit:
> normies with poor reading comprehension
OK. You object in the most strenuous terms to anyone making any sort of judgment about a person wearing AirPods, but are happy to throw out insults at people who disagree with you in the mildest of terms. Got it.
I tried conversing with somebody recently, and they were completely ignoring me. Then I saw the Airpods. Of course. They have music or something else going on.
For now, Airpods = "I am listening to something other than you right now." So yes, if somebody were wearing Airpods as a hearing device, I'd probably not talk to them because of that expectation.
Offer not valid if it's your in-laws, nurse, kid's teacher, your teacher, civil servant who you need to convince, and overall anyone in a position of authority or otherwise capable of gatekeeping you. You can't always just opt out of dealing with people without consequence.
You'd homeschool your kids because their teachers find it odd that you're wearing AirPods during a conversation? To each his own, I guess.
> Nurse? If they commit intentional malpractice, my attorney is ready to go.
In what world does subtly judging you for wearing AirPods during a conversation qualify as malpractice?
But now that Apple entered the market, maybe they will come out with wireless headphones that are more suitable?