Re:1913: When Hitler, Trotsky, Tito, Freud and Stalin all li...
by roenxi on Thursday September 12, 2024 @09:15PM
(#41527250)
The bulk of the risk wouldn't really scale with number of warheads though would it? I was thinking it is more of a binary. There is some number of warheads that is enough.
The experience in the Cuban Missile crisis suggests that the number deployed on submarines is probably more of a concern when it comes to miscalculation than the total. And for deliberate attacks the militaries have probably calculated that the number currently deployed is reasonable to wipe out a major power.
Re:1913: When Hitler, Trotsky, Tito, Freud and Stalin all li...
by stickfigure on Friday September 13, 2024 @01:24PM
(#41533235)
The risk of an accident or otherwise unintentional initiation goes up with the number of warheads deployed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_submarine_B-59#Nuclear_...
(or of course Dr Strangelove)
[1] https://www.energy.gov/nnsa/transparency-us-nuclear-weapons-... [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_nuclear_weapons_sto...