Re:Apple acquires "identity pollution" patent aimed at fight...
by saturdaysaint on Sunday June 24, 2012 @12:10AM
(#4152565)
This is more about confounding certain advertising based companies than anything... I'm almost surprised Safari doesn't block ads by default already.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Apple acquires "identity pollution" patent aimed at fight...
by gcb on Sunday June 24, 2012 @01:21AM
(#4152654)
because safari requires work arounds from most sites to work 100%.
remove ads, and the efort to suport that browser just die.
Re:Apple acquires "identity pollution" patent aimed at fight...
by Karunamon on Sunday June 24, 2012 @02:17AM
(#4152734)
Safari = Webkit. The same workarounds would have to be done for Chrome.
Re:Apple acquires "identity pollution" patent aimed at fight...
by pirateking on Sunday June 24, 2012 @04:34AM
(#4152919)
Not true. Safari and Chrome are both built on top of WebKit.
Re:Apple acquires "identity pollution" patent aimed at fight...
by Karunamon on Sunday June 24, 2012 @11:41AM
(#4153509)
That's what I meant.
Re:Apple acquires "identity pollution" patent aimed at fight...
by JoeCortopassi on Sunday June 24, 2012 @09:30AM
(#4153267)
Every browser has it's nuances that must be accounted for when developing. Safari wouldn't die for the same reason I.E. hasn't: it's bundled with a hugely popular OS