No? What xame to mind when someone talks about jobs in programming ans the list presented just refers to long lived langagues and existing code bases along side the need yo maintain them.

Then theres the double entndre with rust and the potsntial yo reduce maintenance and how what really matters is some kund of metric like loc per dev hours for maintenance. So like, if two language are comparable and one requires 2 prgrammers to maintian and the other 2.5, the second one would potentially have more jobs based entirely on how maintainable it is.

So claiming "these have more jobs" really is a fecestious statement