Google says replacing C/C++ in firmware with Rust is easy

Re:Google says replacing C/C++ in firmware with Rust is easy by AYBABTME on Saturday September 07, 2024 @10:53PM (#41477873)

Faster with Python ergonomics is Go. Safer with C++ perf is Rust.

(my rule of thumb)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google says replacing C/C++ in firmware with Rust is easy by oscillonoscope on Saturday September 07, 2024 @11:08PM (#41477927)

If you haven't checked it out, nim sits at a really good middle ground for ergonomics, safety, and speed.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google says replacing C/C++ in firmware with Rust is easy by AYBABTME on Sunday September 08, 2024 @11:15AM (#41480894)

I haven't looked at it in years, but that's what I've been hearing indeed.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google says replacing C/C++ in firmware with Rust is easy by pjmlp on Sunday September 08, 2024 @12:39PM (#41481374)

For faster with Python ergonomics,

Common Lisp, Scheme, Julia, OCaml, F#, C#, Scala, Kotlin, TypeScript, Clojure

[ Parent | on HN ]