Re:Internet Archive loses appeal over eBook lending
by ndriscoll on Thursday September 05, 2024 @09:51AM
(#41456637)
That does sort of sound like Cloudflare is pulling the shenanigans. It's awfully convenient for a CDN company (the same company that MITMs half the web) to cite privacy concerns to not pass through data to enable better request routing. In almost all cases the DNS lookup precedes a connection from the client anyway.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Internet Archive loses appeal over eBook lending
by CrazyStat on Thursday September 05, 2024 @04:32PM
(#41460177)
EDNS subnet/ECS is an optional DNS extension. DNS requests have no obligation to provide it. archive.is's behavior is in violation of RFC 7871 [1]:
> Note again that a query MUST NOT be refused solely because it provides 0 address bits.
The shenanigans are absolutely on archive.is's side here.
Re:Internet Archive loses appeal over eBook lending
by greyface- on Thursday September 05, 2024 @04:57PM
(#41460351)
When the RFC refers to a query being refused, it's talking about a response with rcode=REFUSED. Archive.is is responding with rcode=NOERROR and bogus RR data. Shenanigans? Yes. RFC violation? No.