News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux by NavinF on Thursday September 05, 2024 @07:13AM (#41455480)
I meant OSs that have consumer market share. Eg on people's desktops and phones. Nobody cares about BSDs and a bunch of embedded GNU/Linux systems
Re:Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux by awilfox on Thursday September 05, 2024 @07:21AM (#41455516)
A lot of people care about BSDs and embedded Linux systems. Such as: Netflix (FreeBSD), anyone with a Linux-based router or cable/DSL modem, and so on.

That said, parallel startup is possible on those systems too. There was an out-of-tree patch for parallel rc(8) on FreeBSD some time ago, and dinit is parallel, etc. I think OpenRC should move towards making parallel startup stable and supported so that those systems can do that as well.

Re:Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux by zekica on Thursday September 05, 2024 @07:40AM (#41455628)
Almost everyone's router is an embedded Busybox/Musl/Linux system. There are billions of them running every day.
Re:Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux by synergy20 on Thursday September 05, 2024 @08:58AM (#41456206)
they don't use openrc though
Re:Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux by btreecat on Thursday September 05, 2024 @08:21AM (#41455892)
Alpine has market share. It's just targeting a different market space than what you're measuring.
Re:Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux by mort96 on Thursday September 05, 2024 @09:50AM (#41456619)
> consumer market share
Re:Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux by marcthe12 on Thursday September 05, 2024 @10:52PM (#41462471)
Some Alpine linux derivatives are kinda want switch to systemd and hence the porting
Re:Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux by bee_rider on Thursday September 05, 2024 @12:02PM (#41457878)
OpenRC doesn’t have huge consumer market share, at least in the context where this sort of thing matters. For regular Linux desktops, most of the distros use SystemD.