Re:Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux
by NavinF on Thursday September 05, 2024 @07:13AM
(#41455480)
I meant OSs that have consumer market share. Eg on people's desktops and phones. Nobody cares about BSDs and a bunch of embedded GNU/Linux systems
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux
by awilfox on Thursday September 05, 2024 @07:21AM
(#41455516)
A lot of people care about BSDs and embedded Linux systems. Such as: Netflix (FreeBSD), anyone with a Linux-based router or cable/DSL modem, and so on.
That said, parallel startup is possible on those systems too. There was an out-of-tree patch for parallel rc(8) on FreeBSD some time ago, and dinit is parallel, etc. I think OpenRC should move towards making parallel startup stable and supported so that those systems can do that as well.
Re:Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux
by zekica on Thursday September 05, 2024 @07:40AM
(#41455628)
Almost everyone's router is an embedded Busybox/Musl/Linux system. There are billions of them running every day.
Re:Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux
by synergy20 on Thursday September 05, 2024 @08:58AM
(#41456206)
they don't use openrc though
Re:Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux
by btreecat on Thursday September 05, 2024 @08:21AM
(#41455892)
Alpine has market share. It's just targeting a different market space than what you're measuring.
Re:Porting systemd to musl Libc-powered Linux
by mort96 on Thursday September 05, 2024 @09:50AM
(#41456619)
> consumer market share