Re:Navy chiefs conspired to get themselves illegal warship W...
by rendall on Wednesday September 04, 2024 @12:48AM
(#41442002)
> we didn't allow personal APs for interference reasons
For "interference reasons"? Would you mind expanding on that?
Re:Navy chiefs conspired to get themselves illegal warship W...
by __d on Wednesday September 04, 2024 @01:51AM
(#41442308)
I imagine the issue was that in earlier WiFi versions, there weren't a lot of channels available. You basically got 2 or 3 (depending on which country you were in) non-interfering channels. The protocols also dealt with congestion less well, I think.
On a university campus, let's assume that at least one of those channels is taken by the campus WiFi, possibly more if they have separate networks for staff or whatever. At that point, you start getting a few dozen private networks running in the dorms, and the campus network(s) grind to a halt.
Any decent SDR can notice such things, presumably not to mention actual EW equipment. It's only really with sub-noise-floor gold code type stuff where a signal doesn't jump out on a waterfall spectrum chart, and even then it's generally fairly obvious at close range. I can only speculate as to why that didn't actually happen here.