News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why bother with argv[0]?. Parent comment

Re:Why bother with argv[0]? by nrclark on Tuesday September 03, 2024 @11:48AM (#41436110)
It can already do that, afaik. When I last checked, BusyBox supported installations via 4 methods:

  - symlink
  - hardlink
  - shell script wrappers
  - executable binary wrappers around libbusybox
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why bother with argv[0]? by Arch-TK on Tuesday September 03, 2024 @03:34PM (#41438341)
Nice!
[ Parent | on HN ]