Re:ARM or x86? ISA Doesn't Matter
by sgerenser on Saturday August 31, 2024 @09:34PM
(#41413499)
Implementing multiplies as a bunch of adds has got to suck for performance though.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:ARM or x86? ISA Doesn't Matter
by colejohnson66 on Saturday August 31, 2024 @10:25PM
(#41413714)
Well, if you decompose it to a series of shifts and adds, it’s a bit quicker. That’s actually how the 8086 implemented it.
Sure. Multiplication is exceedingly rare compared to any of those 8 instructions though. RISC-V base instruction set doesn't include multiplication for example. If you had room to add more then 8 I would rather add the bitops first. This will allow you to also write a much more efficient soft mul in addition to many more things.