If the goal is to shock people into thinking a certain way, 20,000 deformed infants has more or less the same shock-value as 1 million deaths.

(Obviously talking about Thalidomide here)

Thalidomide was used and approved around the world, not just in the US. It’s an interesting example of something but not millions of deaths.

But I get a sense that the original poster isn’t sincerely interested in talking about the complex question, how should the FDA regulate drugs?

One thing’s for sure: High drama personalities have always had a tenuous understanding of the facts behind their “shock” and outrages. Or maybe one of the commenters has learned a valuable lesson about copy and pasting from chatbots.

Speaking of factual drama, Thalidomide was not approved in the US during all the drama in the 60s.

It has since been approved for cancer where its benefits outweigh the side effects, but it doesn't negate that the FDA prevented harm to babies by blocking it in the 60s.