News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Update on Llama adoption by talldayo on Thursday August 29, 2024 @12:21PM (#41392460)
No, I really can't imagine it. Extrapolating from our free commercially-licensed offerings it would seem most people would ignore it or share stories on Reddit about how FreeGPT poisoned their family when generating a potato salad recipe.
Re:Update on Llama adoption by koolala on Thursday August 29, 2024 @12:39PM (#41392683)
An open source model would be able to give you the sources of its potato salad recipe inspiration. It would be the best of both worlds. AI Knowledge + Real Open Human Knowledge.
Re:Update on Llama adoption by valine on Thursday August 29, 2024 @01:27PM (#41393198)
Just because you have the dataset doesn't mean you can generate a reference. Let's say I hand you a potato salad recipe and a copy of the entire internet. Say you somehow extract all potato salad recipes from the dataset (non trivial btw) and none of them are an exact match for the recipe the model generated. Now what?
Re:Update on Llama adoption by JumpCrisscross on Thursday August 29, 2024 @12:40PM (#41392692)
> open source model would be able to give you the source of its potaeo salad recipe

Kagi’s LLM can already do that. I believe so can Perplexity’s. Citing sources isn’t something only open models can do.

Re:Update on Llama adoption by koolala on Thursday August 29, 2024 @01:22PM (#41393140)
I'm pretty sure Kagi is like a normal search engine with AI integration like Google. Not an AI designed to be open source with an open dataset of knowledge it was trained on.
Re:Update on Llama adoption by JumpCrisscross on Thursday August 29, 2024 @01:26PM (#41393193)
> pretty sure Kagi is like a normal search engine with AI integration like Google

Sure. The point is the thing you said only an open-source model can do, it can do. Plenty of proprietary LLMs can cite sources.

The plain truth is most of the benefits of open models are not on the consumer side. (Or at least, I haven't seen any articulated.) They're on the producers'. Open models are better for those of us training models. That's partly why the open data debate is academic--very few people are training large foundation models because the compute and electricity costs are prohibitive.

Re:Update on Llama adoption by koolala on Thursday August 29, 2024 @01:58PM (#41393542)
I'm kinda hoping World Governments will use their Public Library infrastructure to train AI. Japan is my #1 hope with how they are opening public science knowledge. Super-computers have been prohibitive for a long time but national science institutions could be a great place for open source & open weight AI.
Re:Update on Llama adoption by JumpCrisscross on Thursday August 29, 2024 @02:25PM (#41393839)
> hoping World Governments will use their Public Library infrastructure to train AI

Genuinely blown away the EU isn't doing this.

In the U.S., the solution may be in carving a legal safe harbor for companies that release their models per the OSI's draft definition of open source.

Re:Update on Llama adoption by talldayo on Thursday August 29, 2024 @03:30PM (#41394460)
I bet Nvidia would quite like that too. Private and public-sector funding, theirs for the taking! Few businesses are ever so lucky.