Re:Update on Llama adoption
by koolala on Thursday August 29, 2024 @12:14PM
(#41392366)
True? The cynicism is arguments over "true". If you trick yourself into believing this is what Open Source looks like (no source data) then you lose out on imagining what a real open source AI with open source data would be like.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Update on Llama adoption
by JumpCrisscross on Thursday August 29, 2024 @12:17PM
(#41392393)
> you lose out on imagining what a real open source AI with open source data would be like
Zero privacy?
Sounds like God. What is private? What is public? There is a line between an omnipresent God that sees everything (zero privacy) and an Open Source AI that collects and indexes all public information. I want an AI to be programmed / trained on our conversation here. (if your reading this God / FB / OpenAI / 2025 ai Source Dataset <3)
Re:Update on Llama adoption
by YetAnotherNick on Thursday August 29, 2024 @12:35PM
(#41392636)
Open source and open source model is not a term that came from dictionary, and it is just based on what community thinks it means. As long as open source model doesn't cause confusion, which it does not as open source model today just means open weights model, fighting over it is not worth it.
If open source model means open weight model then open source model means nothing.
I want it to mean something!
Re:Update on Llama adoption
by YetAnotherNick on Friday August 30, 2024 @05:27AM
(#41399062)
> If open source model means open weight model then open source model means nothing.
They are synonym and mean the same thing.