Their numbers indicate ~17,000 miles between any safety driver disengagement. Tesla does not release comparable data, but the highly pro-Tesla biased community-reported numbers[4] average ~42 miles between disengagements.
[1] https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/vehicle-industry-services/auto...
[2] https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/vehicle-industry-services/auto...
[3] https://thelastdriverlicenseholder.com/2024/02/03/2023-disen...
Maybe Tesla should treat FSD like Waymo, only available in certain cities to a few hundred drivers? As a pedestrian that would make me feel a little better about it.
I'm familiar with that intersection in Tempe. There is a bar for beating the average human driver on it, and going to wrong way is sadly not above it.
I'm also not aware of any fatalities resulting from a Waymo accident. (Waymo also doesn't seem to be deluded about its system's safety. That's why they have human drivers on standby, remote and in person.)
They didn't even release the video when a Waymo hit a bike while turning left at an intersection a few months ago.
Tesla doesn't report to CA DMV because they are only a "driver assistance system".
[1] https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/vehicle-industry-services/auto...
https://abc7.com/post/wrong-waymo-driverless-car-goes-oncomi...
Waymo hits stationary pole.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAZP-RNSr0s
If Waymo is as good as you claim, then why don't they release data on the number of manual interventions>
It's just the Waymo's missteps are unlikely to show up on HN unlike Tesla's.
FSD can navigate crowds too.